Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Wednesday, 7th January 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Buteman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Outrage at Rothesay pier fence plan


Barbed wire security barrier to welcome visitors

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
25 June 2008
PLANS to permanently close the front of Rothesay pier to members of the public with an eight foot high security fence topped with barbed wire have provoked a furious response from locals this week.

The fence, along the length of the front of the pier, is due to be erected by mid-August - right at the height of the tourist season, and just in time for the island's busiest day of the year, the Bute Highland Games - under Westminster legislation o
n the security of ports and the people and ships which use them.

The fence will stretch from just behind the entrance to the moorings at the west end of the pier, along past the old linkspan berth and past the pier building to the east, ending opposite the Albert Pier, with gaps to allow vehicles and passengers to board and to disembark from the Wemyss Bay ferry.

News of the fence was disclosed at this week's meeting of Bute Community Council - though it wasn't until Mike Moffat, the engineer supervising the pier and harbour development work for Argyll and Bute Council, filled in some of the factual gaps for us after the meeting that we realised what the fence would look like.

Due to be put up between July 22 and August 18, the fence will feature steel posts three metres high, at three metre intervals, with welded mesh steel sheets two and a half metres (8.2 feet) high in between, all topped with three strands of barbed wire.

Tim Saul, chairman of the Isle of Bute Marketing and Tourism Group, said on hearing the news: "I would urge the council to think again and find a more aesthetically pleasing solution to the safety and security issues on the pier.

"Given the vast sums of money that have been invested in waterfront improvements in Rothesay, it seems that the new ship is to be spoiled for a ha'porth of tar.

"Let us give warm welcome to our visitors, not put them off ever returning."

Mr Saul has also canvassed opinion among members of the group, and responses so far have unanimously condemned both the need for, and the design of, the fence, with one even questioning the legality of barbed wire in public places.

Island councillor Robert Macintyre said he had contacted the council's planning department to find out if the fence needed planning permission.

"I suspect I will be told that it is 'permitted development'," he said "but I would like to know who designed this fence.

"It will give visitors to this island a first impression that they are approaching a prison – Alcatraz springs to mind.

"I will be urging my two colleagues to delay this scheduled work until some sanity prevails. Do these people who don't live on our island care about the scars their decisions will permanently leave behind them?"

His colleague Cllr Isobel Strong added: "I think this is security gone mad. Do the powers that be think that Rothesay is in the forefront of international terrorism, and that a high fence with barbed wire is necessary?"

Cllr Scoullar said he had been advised that the height and design of the fence was indeed necessary to meet the terms of the legislation, but that consultants Scott Wilson Scotland are to be asked to revisit
the design "in light of public disquiet".

Mr Moffat advised that the fence was needed to comply with the Department of Transport's 'Transec' policy on the protection of passengers, ports and shipping.

"In addition," he told us, "the new plant and machinery now in place, the changes to the traffic routes on and off the ferry and the creation of the additional berth for overnight use by CalMac at the former linkspan location have all put additional health and safety responsibilities on the council as pier owner in relation to the maintenance of public safety."

Brian Fulton, Caledonian MacBrayne's regional manager for Bute, said the decisions on the need for the fence and its erection and design had been taken without any involvement from the company.

Cllr Macintyre said he would be seeking a meeting with the council's health and safety officer and the official in charge of piers and harbours to look at possible alternatives.

* What do you think about the design of the security fence? Does Rothesay pier need a security fence at all, or is it better to be safe than sorry? Sign in or register below to have your say.



The full article contains 768 words and appears in The Buteman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 26 June 2008 11:36 AM
  • Source: The Buteman
  • Location: Isle of Bute
 
Prev
1
2
1

Mark McCormack, BCC member.,

Rothesay Tartan Shop 26/06/2008 12:36:49
Outrageous and Unbelievable. Welcome to fortress Bute. Just what the hell are the Council playing at. It seems quite clear to me that Argyll and Bute Council have deliberatly kept the details of this fence seceret in an attempt to sneak it thought without making the public aware of it first, has they did with the 'hut on the hump'. When this was first raised by MR A.MacDonld of Bute Angling it was made out to be a simple health and safety issue by Cllr Scoullar. But since this matter has come before the BCC it has come apparent that this is a lot more than a simple health and safety issure and shame on Cllr Scoullar for not telling us the full extent ot the proposal. What is more serious than the public not being told is that the other 2 Councillers were not aware of the plans either.
The town of Rothesay is supposed to be a conservation area. If they are trying to chase people away from the island then they are going the right way about it. To quote the legislation and tell us there it is, there's nothing we can do, just get on with it, is not an exceptable answer. If there is to be a fence then surly there is scope within the legislation for it to fit into its surroundings. If there is such a big concern about the boats then the simple answer is to let them berth offshore at night.
Taking this one step further will every ferry berth throughtout the whole of the UK be surrounded by an 8 foot high steel fence. Will every bag and suitcase have to go thought an X Ray scanner before you get on the boat. This is nothing more than unstoppable MADNESS!!!
2

David J Kilpatrick,

Bute 27/06/2008 20:44:49
Again lets mess up our island even further. The building site on the clyde it should be called not jewel on the clyde. If the current council continue to disturb summer trade for the retailers the way they are they can have the keys to my shop and see how they get on in the current climate of continual work over the summer period. FACT: visitor numbers are down a blind man can see that who wants to holiday on a building site, they will be dishing out hard hats and flourescant jackets at the pier for incoming tourists to make them feel at home.FACT ferry fares are far too expensive but hey ho who has the gumtion to stand up and be counted and change it instead of hiding behind smoke screens and buerocracy.
3

andrew mcdonald,

bute angling 28/06/2008 09:34:57
I couldnt agree more with the comments so far made - what a welcome it is going to be for people coming to Bute. Two years a building site welcome and now a ridiculous barbed wire fence. I would like the council to show the legislation behind this - is it compulsory or simply advisory? Are we going to have all harbours fenced off so?
I also fail to understand how it would appear that it is only now some of the councilors have become aware of this fence - in my letter to the buteman last month i qouted from an email saying that access to the pier was effectively to be closed off to all public use unless you are getting on a ferry. At a BCC meeting which i attended councilors did not feel that this was the case and were in agreement that the pier would still be open to all and in connection to my view on allowing anglers to fish on the pier were generally in favour subject to reviewing health and safety issues. It would appear that these same people are now shocked by what they are seeing happening!
The simple facts are that this should not be allowed to happen and i firmly believe that this is legislation that is simply being taking to far at a local level not a goverment one. I Would urge all the residents of Bute to stand up and fight this nonesense and get Rothesay harbour back to way it should be - one of the most beautiful natural harbours in scotland!! and not a ridiculous high security zone. And please dont think i am against sensible security measures - but this is just too far and totally uneccesary.
4

Douglas Weir,

Bute 28/06/2008 21:04:15
I totally agree with the previous comments. This legislation may apply to International ports like Greenock or Southampton but Rothesay is a holiday resort. I don't remember seeing something similar at other piers around the coastline. For years I have gone down the pier to see friends away on the ferry, now I will have to look over an 8 foot fence. In the current climate with money short this is a total waste. Surely some common sense can prevail and preserve our picturesque water front instead of creating a prison like environment
5

Scotland Free or a desert,

Midlothian 28/06/2008 22:31:22
I do not stay on Bute, but have visited this beautiful island lots of times. I really cant believe what I am reading, I think the loonies are running the asylum, this is madness. My memories as a kid were being able to walk along the pier front and watch the coming and going of the ships, this fence is just plain stupid. Terrorists, what a joke, even when the IRA was at its height this would never have happened, and not to make to much of a political point, why would any terrorist want to come to Bute. Again another pointless task conjured up by the real Nut who resides in No 10 Downing Street.
6

Mark McCormack, BCC member.,

Rothesay Tartan Shop 29/06/2008 10:59:13
further to my previous comments....Thanks to someone in the know they have pointed me towards the legislation which I believe Cllr Scoullar was alluding to at the last BCC meeting.
SOLAS (International Converntion for the Safety Of Life At Sea, 1974 ), part of the International Maritime Organization, brought into force in July 2004 the Comprehensive Maritime Security Measures. These new security measures covered everything to do with sea travel but the most important aspect of these measures, which the Council seems to have failed to understand, is that it covers sea travel and ships only
' Engaged in INTERNATIONAL VOYAGES ' not ships traveling from one port to another within the same counrty, and to quote the very first sentence under the heading PORT FACILITY it says ''Each contracting government has to ensure completion of a port facility security assessment for each port facility within its territory that serves ships engaged on international voyages''. Every reference to ships and ports within this legislation is from an international aspect only.
This information is freely available to anyone who wants to take a look by putting SOLAS into google, click to the Maritime Security link on the right hand side and then scroll down to the Port Facility heading.
7

frank gourlay,

bridge of weir renfrewshire 29/06/2008 13:29:52
Like lots of young children born in the 60s rothesay was the place to spend your summer holidays or even new years eve in the bute hotel if you were lucky like i was.for me the island was a very magical place full of colourfull lights all over the bay hanging from every lampost crazy golf, putting the guy queen and even the giant peacock with his lights but for me most of all it was the pier all the hustle of the steamers with the people coming and going The fishing was a fantastic (i now flyfish for scotland thanks to that pier) cod pollack saith they were all there but sadly not any more your once little island is a sad sad empty place to visit in that people only come back to catch maybe some memories cab mans rest gone ( i dont care if its getting moved ) it was somthing you could remember seeing coming into the bay you only put water in the fountain 3 years ago and now to end it all a fence around the pier.You really should take along hard look at yourselfs and hang your heads in shame for what you have done because at the end of the day its familys like my own that possibly wont be coming back.
8

Roger Harrison,

Kettledrum Cafe 29/06/2008 17:54:54
I thought fences were built to keep people in or out.
As Calmac has done the job of keeping people out with their inflated prices, presumably it is to keep people of Bute from escaping the brain washing of Rothesay council.
The council are obviously for it as they have no intention of helping businesses to give any tourists what they want from a holiday - enjoyment, family entertainment etc. Not even a toilet for the public to use unless they walk back to Camp Rothesay Pier.
9

Chris Turner,

Rothesay 30/06/2008 10:16:47
Essentially the wonderous view from my living room window is to be spoiled because of someone elses religion, somewhere else in the world!
When will people wake up!
10

Zak.,

Guantanamo Bute 30/06/2008 21:36:23
is this someones idea of a joke to get revenge for all the 'negative' comments regarding the harbour work!?
Prev
1
2

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.